Sorry, Allan, I failed see you raised Biden's executive order. The Administration has already received a one year "stay" suspension of the first amendment, Free Speech. I think Open AI poses a great threat the 2024 end of Democratic and Free Speech Theater in the West, and the Shadow Governments have become too used tech giants being compliant in turning objective reality into a virtual world. So, we are going to see a clamp down of AI developed by engineers and tinkerers.
Modern warfare has already shown us the dangers that electronic miniaturization and reduced cost can threaten Goliaths ... as we have seen with drones. The slow moving elites and militarist have yet to determine how this new technology can be centralized and controlled.
In the categories of interesting developments, I would consider the following. As I have said AI is not life, because it lacks a body (mean it's own body) and perception of time (memories and evolution of relationships and thoughts yield a perception of time).
There are no 80-year old boomers. The oldest boomers, born in 1945 are 78. Maybe we can get some quoted comments limited to those who aren't arithmetically-challenged.
I am a child of the 50's who grew up in the shadow of WWII.
I went into the new field of computers as I fell in love with it, but I am less enamored with it now. Due to many disappoints as to how the story has turned out versus the amazing promises the field held.
I find generative AI to be an interesting topic, but I don't consider it computer science; more alchemy. CS shows up the most in the preparation of training corpus preparation and scoring.
I think there are a great many CS challenges: distributed network construction, resource allocation, algorithmic optimisations, IO control, reverse engineering the links between "output knowledge" and inputs..... And then we'll get into signal analysis for bio interfaces etc etc
Interesting your publication was a just a little late for Biden’s AI Executive Order. I don’t see it targeted at nation states or Fortune 500 corporates. Mainly, I see it as a means to reign in the very prolific open AI movement. Which is the best chance we currently have of this technology to be used for the good of society. We have seen too much of Big Pharma not concerned with health; and the MIC not concerned with peace and security. Certainly, AI in the hands of Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla will be no different.
Sorry, Allan, I failed see you raised Biden's executive order. The Administration has already received a one year "stay" suspension of the first amendment, Free Speech. I think Open AI poses a great threat the 2024 end of Democratic and Free Speech Theater in the West, and the Shadow Governments have become too used tech giants being compliant in turning objective reality into a virtual world. So, we are going to see a clamp down of AI developed by engineers and tinkerers.
Modern warfare has already shown us the dangers that electronic miniaturization and reduced cost can threaten Goliaths ... as we have seen with drones. The slow moving elites and militarist have yet to determine how this new technology can be centralized and controlled.
In the categories of interesting developments, I would consider the following. As I have said AI is not life, because it lacks a body (mean it's own body) and perception of time (memories and evolution of relationships and thoughts yield a perception of time).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ2QOPWZKVc
The Biden clamp down will only apply to the US and none of the other countries engaged in this work.
There are no 80-year old boomers. The oldest boomers, born in 1945 are 78. Maybe we can get some quoted comments limited to those who aren't arithmetically-challenged.
I am a child of the 50's who grew up in the shadow of WWII.
I went into the new field of computers as I fell in love with it, but I am less enamored with it now. Due to many disappoints as to how the story has turned out versus the amazing promises the field held.
I find generative AI to be an interesting topic, but I don't consider it computer science; more alchemy. CS shows up the most in the preparation of training corpus preparation and scoring.
I think there are a great many CS challenges: distributed network construction, resource allocation, algorithmic optimisations, IO control, reverse engineering the links between "output knowledge" and inputs..... And then we'll get into signal analysis for bio interfaces etc etc
Interesting your publication was a just a little late for Biden’s AI Executive Order. I don’t see it targeted at nation states or Fortune 500 corporates. Mainly, I see it as a means to reign in the very prolific open AI movement. Which is the best chance we currently have of this technology to be used for the good of society. We have seen too much of Big Pharma not concerned with health; and the MIC not concerned with peace and security. Certainly, AI in the hands of Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, and Tesla will be no different.